Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Acta Haematol ; 146(2): 117-124, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2254702

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Severe COVID-19 illness can lead to thrombotic complications, organ failure, and death. Antithrombin (AT) regulates thromboinflammation and is a key component of chemical thromboprophylaxis. Our goal was to examine the link between AT activity and responsiveness to thromboprophylaxis, markers of hypercoagulability, and inflammation among severe COVID-19 patients. METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective observational study enrolling SARS-CoV-2-positive patients admitted to the intensive care unit on prophylactic enoxaparin. Blood was collected daily for 7 days to assess AT activity and anti-factor Xa levels. Patient demographics, outcomes, and hospital laboratory results were collected. Continuous variables were compared using Mann-Whitney tests, and categorical variables were compared using χ2 tests. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association between AT activity and mortality. RESULTS: In 36 patients, 3 thromboembolic events occurred, and 18 (50%) patients died. Patients who died had higher fibrinogen, D-dimer, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and lower AT activity. Reduced AT activity was independently associated with mortality and correlated with both markers of hypercoagulability (D-dimer) and inflammation (CRP). CONCLUSION: Low AT activity is associated with mortality and persistent hypercoagulable and proinflammatory states in severe COVID-19 patients. The anti-thromboinflammatory properties of AT make it an appealing therapeutic target for future studies.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Thrombophilia , Thrombosis , Venous Thromboembolism , Humans , COVID-19/complications , Anticoagulants , Inflammation , SARS-CoV-2 , Antithrombins , Thromboinflammation , Venous Thromboembolism/complications , Antithrombin III
2.
Am Surg ; 88(8): 1970-1975, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1932939

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Limitations in available donors have dramatically reduced plasma availability over the past several decades, concurrent with increasing demand for some types of plasma. Plasma from female donors who are pregnant or taking oral contraceptives often has a green appearance, which frequently results in these units being discarded. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the hemostatic potential of green compared to standard-color plasma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Plasma from twelve blood group-matched female and twelve male donors was obtained from the local blood center. Six of the female and all of the male units of plasma had a normal appearance (STANDARD), while six of the female units were grossly green (GREEN). The hemostatic potential was evaluated by thrombelastography (TEG), calibrated automated thrombogram (CAT), and coagulation factor level measurements. Univariate analysis was performed using Wilcoxon Rank-Sum. RESULTS: GREEN plasma was more procoagulant for all TEG values (r-value, k-time, angle, mA) when compared to STANDARD plasma. Differences were also observed in coagulation factor levels, with GREEN plasma having higher than STANDARD (factors II; VII, IX; X, XI, Protein S, and plasminogen); conversely, GREEN plasma had a longer lag time in CAT. DISCUSSION: This pilot study demonstrates that female donors with green plasma have a superior hemostatic profile than standard plasma. GREEN plasma should be further investigated for its safety profile and hemostatic potential, so if it is found to be a safe and functionally non-inferior product, it should be actively re-introduced for transfusion in bleeding patients.


Subject(s)
Hemostatics , Blood Coagulation Factors , Female , Hemostasis , Humans , Male , Pilot Projects , Pregnancy , Thrombelastography/methods
4.
Clin Med (Lond) ; 21(3): e290-e294, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1148364

ABSTRACT

We determined the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in NHS healthcare workers (HCWs) in a cross-sectional study from a large general hospital located in a double-sited rural and semi-rural area. The sample size of 3,119 HCWs (mean age 43±13) consisted of 75.2% women, 61.1% White individuals and predominantly (62.4%) asymptomatic individuals. Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was 19.7%. Determinants of seropositivity were preceding symptomatic infection and non-White ethnicity. Regardless of staff role or sex, multivariate regression analysis revealed that non-White HCWs were three times (odds ratio [OR] 3.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.53-3.86, P<0.001) more likely to have antibodies than White staff, and seven times (OR 7.10, 95% CI 5.72-8.87, P<0.001) more likely if there was a history of preceding symptoms. We report relatively high rates of seropositivity in all NHS healthcare workers. Non-White symptomatic HCWs were significantly more likely to be seropositive than their colleagues, independent of age, sex or staff role.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adult , Antibodies, Viral , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Personnel , Hospitals , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Seroepidemiologic Studies , State Medicine , United Kingdom/epidemiology
5.
BMJ Open ; 10(11): e042090, 2020 11 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-927074

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics and outcomes of hospitalised patients with COVID-19 from UK in the highest decile of health and gross regional products per capita. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Recruited all adult inpatients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 symptoms admitted to a single Surrey centre between March and April 2020. Extensive demographic details were documented. OUTCOME MEASURE: COVID-19 status of alive/dead and intensive care unit (ICU) status of yes/no. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with COVID-19 from Surrey centre UK (n=429). RESULTS: 429 adult inpatients (mean age 70±18 years; men 56.4%) were included in this study, of whom, 19.1% required admission to ICU and 31.9% died. Adverse outcomes were associated with age (OR with each decade of years: 1.78, 95% CI 1.53 to 2.11, p<0.001 for mortality); male gender (OR=1.08, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.63, p=0.72, present in 70.7%, of admissions to ICU versus 53% of other cases, p=0.004); cardiac disease (OR=3.43, 95% CI 2.10 to 5.63, p<0.001), diabetes mellitus (OR=2.37, 95% CI 1.09 to 5.17, p=0.028) and dementia (OR=5.06, 95% CI 2.79 to 9.44, p<0.001). There was no significant impact of ethnicity or body mass index on disease outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Despite reports of worse outcomes in deprived regions, we show similar complication and mortality rates due to COVID-19 in an affluent and high life expectancy region.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Inpatients , Intensive Care Units , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Hospital Mortality/trends , Hospitalization/trends , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , United Kingdom/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL